🔗 Share this article

I possess some thoughts about that comments made by ESPN broadcaster Chris Fowler following the Serbian champion's win over the American player during the New York major last eight. Consider – the athlete represents American, the commentator is American – and sports often encourage nationalism. A little bit of letdown would have been appropriate. Instead, he invoked the continued drought of US male players at grand slam tournaments: not one of them has won a title since the last American champion in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the competition.

Everyone enjoy a storyline, myself included. But come on. Even if Fritz defeated Djokovic for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the following match, who Fritz has yet to beat in an competitive encounter. And had he someway gotten past that, it would have been title holder Jannik Sinner, versus him the American had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the last seven major titles (plus Alcaraz proceeded to thrash a fatigued Serbian in the next round). Fritz said in press following his defeat that he actually preferred his path, because it offered the opportunity to defeat the top three players in the world back-to-back. Fritz is more than justified to aim for the achievement; an athlete is meant to believe in themselves. But entering that Serbian last eight match what other person in their right mind had the drought of American champions on the brain?

Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the only thing standing in her way and sustained success

Fritz, twenty-eight, is placed fourth in the world entering this week’s year-end championships and has secured his previous six matches over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. Presumably he could take that spot for himself in the coming years. But evidently that right now, that is as far as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard lie a vast gap of ranking points away. Fritz’s top-class delivery and concussive strength on both forehand and reverse side are sufficiently enough to dispose of the majority of rivals on the professional circuit. Against the handful of generational talents, however, he is frequently overmatched. The past few years has seen the curious emergence of tall, gangly athletes who can nevertheless cover the court with the surprising speed and grace of smaller players. He is six-foot-five and looks it. His footwork is stiff, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the other player was dictating, and hitting a soft shot versus him is usually a reliable tactic. That acts as a pretty severe limitation on his potential.

The American has achieved a number of dramatic, improbable advancements throughout his career. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the bottom of the top 30. Two years after, he was approaching the elite ten. The previous season, he unexpectedly exploded to No 4 – and held the spot. But the subsequent step, competing against and defeating legendary figures like Alcaraz, Sinner, and even a declining Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What was the commentator have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was worth mentioning the continuing slump of US male players winning grand slams when he had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just too much and the respect for the magnitude of the challenge too little.

The American star made a career-best advancement to the Wimbledon semi-finals in the summer.

Fritz’s performance in that exact quarter-final should have been sufficient of an sign. The Serbian won in four rounds, a victory that only felt tenuous for moments towards the very end, when Fritz had saved a couple championship opportunities and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The pair appeared evenly matched during the exchanges, with the American earning numerous chances to break. But Djokovic saved service break opportunity after break point, extending the run to the point of frustration. When Fritz finally did claim a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately produced a horrendous service game to drop serve once more; Djokovic had drawn him into a battle secondary to the real battle and compelled him to expend far too much energy to win it. Facing match points in the last game, Fritz’s first serve sailed to heaven. He prolonged the contest two times on his backup delivery, but ultimately double-faulted. It wasn’t a choke, in my opinion, just a result of needing to hit an excessive number of second serves.

The contest was fairly compelling proof that Fritz is not good enough to defeat any version of Djokovic, that was defeated by Alcaraz in the next round and never particularly seem like he thought he could win. This is absolutely fine – the Serbian is the greatest of all time, and may not be at the height of his physical powers anymore, but has acquired enough knowledge and strategic intelligence to compensate for quite a bit of the drop-off. The problem is those who were anticipating the American to win, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was had not done anything that indicated he could.

Fritz is an asset to the tour regardless. He’s a patient, reflective presence in media sessions, more so than virtually everyone on the ATP aside from Daniil Medvedev, willing to not only say how he feels or the tactic he believed decided a match, but clarify it. That he should bear the brunt of the blame for America not spawn a men's grand slam winner since Andy Roddick feels unfair. (Now that the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, maybe they can share that burden.)

ATP Finals: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Group

• The Spanish phenom
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Bjorn Borg Group

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably dwell on it indefinitely if I don’t do it,” Fritz informed an interviewer in June of claiming a major. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not unsuccessful if he does not fulfill that objective, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is in fact extremely unlikely for everybody else. {