🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has declared it is pursuing compensation amounting to $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This legal step constitutes a clear warning by the Kremlin against plans to utilize immobilized Russian state funds to aid Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

Based on accounts in Russian news outlets, the central bank initiated a lawsuit last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This amount corresponds to the aforementioned $230 billion demand.

EU leaders are set to decide in the coming days regarding a plan to leverage approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. The proposal involves granting Ukraine with a large loan to finance its defence and financial stability.

The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution serves as the main custodian for the Kremlin's immobilised sovereign wealth.

A Clash Over Legality

European Union officials have argued that their proposal is on solid legal ground. They argue rests on the principle that title of the state assets remains with Russia, despite being it was frozen in European jurisdictions shortly after the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

Moscow, in contrast, has labeled any utilization of the funds as illegal appropriation. Authorities have warned of reciprocal measures, such as seizing European private investors' assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has assumed a prominent position in peace negotiations, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its assets. He warned that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Wider Implications

In comments interpreted as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the proposal as "a severe attack on the right to ownership and the international reserves system established by the United States."

The clearing house refused to comment on the latest legal action. It has in the past stated it is contending with more than 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although courts in EU countries are unlikely to recognize judgments from Russian courts, experts expect Moscow to seek enforcement in nations with stronger relations to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia could try to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, if relevant assets can be identified," commented a lawyer from an international firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities said they are developing measures to discourage other countries from assisting any Russian lawsuits against European entities. They are also designing protections to shield EU countries with assets in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the detailed plan, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would stay untouched.

Ukraine would solely be required to return the money in the event that Russia agreed to pay compensation for the immense damage inflicted during the ongoing war.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to examine an different approach for funding Ukraine. This involves common EU debt issuance to fund a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the European budget.

Such a proposal, however, demands full agreement among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has already expressed its opposition.

Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, said the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest option" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is based on the Russian frozen assets, which means it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is also significant," she stated. "Furthermore, it delivers a powerful message that when you do all this destruction to another nation, you have to pay for the reparations."